Current Issue
Organiser Home
Editorial
EXPOSE
Reports
Comment
The Moving Finger Writes
Media Watch
Thinking Aloud
Bookmark
A PAGE FROM HISTORY
RETROSPECT
Kids Org.
News Round-up
Readers’ Forum:
INTERESTING PEOPLE
PERSPECTIVE
Kerala Newsletter

Previous Issues
September 04, 2011

August 28, 2011
August 21, 2011
August 14, 2011
August 07, 2011

July 31, 2011
July 24, 2011
July 17, 2011
July 10, 2011
July 03, 2011

June 26, 2011
June 19, 2011
June 12, 2011
June 05, 2011

May 29, 2011
May 22, 2011
May 15, 2011
May 08, 2011
May 01, 2011

April 24, 2011
April 17, 2011
April 10, 2011
April 03, 2011

March 27, 2011
March 20, 2011
March 13, 2011
March 06, 2011

February 27, 2011
February 20, 2011
February 13, 2011
February 06, 2011

January 30, 2011
January 23, 2011
January 16, 2011
January 09, 2011
January 02, 2011

December 26, 2010
December 19, 2010
December 12, 2010
December 05, 2010
November 28, 2010
November 21, 2010
November 14, 2010
November 7, 2010

October 31, 2010
October 24, 2010
October 17, 2010
October 10, 2010
October 03, 2010

2010 Issues
2009 Issues
2008 Issues
2007 Issues
2006 Issues

Organiser
About us
Advertisement
Circulation
Contact us

Subscribe


May 17, 2009




Page: 11/35

Home > 2009 Issues > May 17, 2009

Think It Over

From affirmation to negation
Limits of Hindu tolerance

By MSN Menon

Kautilya hailed Charvaka philosophy as one of the three most important doctrines, the other being Sankhya and Uoga. The Mahabharata speaks highly of Charvakas as ?venerable sages.?

?Doubt is the beginning of wisdom,? says Betrand Russell, the Philosopher.

The Rig Veda begins with doubts. A hymn says:
Who is there who truly knows
And who can say whence this
Unfathomed world, and
From what cause?
Or, do even the gods not know?

Thus, the Vedas affirm as also deny the existence of God. They mark the limits of Hindu tolerance.

Doubt generates enquiry. Enquiry led to freedom of thought. And freedom of thought led to diversity of beliefs. And diversity of beliefs led to tolerance. There is no parallel to this in the world. The world knows Hinduism by its freedom and tolerance.

Vedic worship began with sacrifices. It turned to rituals. Rituals dominated everything till doubts came to be expressed on their efficacy.

It was Kapila, author of Sankhya (6th c BC) who first challenged the Vedic way of life. The Sankhya is the oldest system of philosophy in the world. Kapila says: The world had always existed. It was never created by a god. Sankhya believed in an evolutionary theory, which is pre-determined by svabhava (or swadharma), not by karma. In this sense, he was anticipating Daring?s theory. And Aurobindo?s theory of super-consciousness. Sankhya influenced both Mahavira as also the Buddha. And we know he had significant influence among the Greek philosophers.

Atheism was respected before the Buddha. It is respected even today. We have the story of Jabali in Valmiki Ramayana. Valmiki says Jabali, an atheist, was ?the greatest of all Brahmins?. He was also one of the greatest scholars of his time. He could argue a cause like a logician. Which is why Bharata sought his help to persuade Rama to return to Ayodhya. In the event, Rama refused to be influenced by Jabali.

Charvaka stood out as the most important person among the materialists of his time. He accepted only the evidence of the senses, and considered death as final. Sensual enjoyment (hedonism) is the end of life and pain is but an unavoidable accompaniment of pleasure, he says. There is no paradise and no ?other? world. The Hindu philosopher accepted Charvaka doctrine of Kama (desire for material things) as one of the objectives of life.

Charvaka make several other points. For example, he did not believer in a soul. He pitied those who took the trouble to accumulate worldly wealth. He condemned the Shradha ceremony. He said the dead needed no food. It is in the nature of things to happen. He called this the svabhava (or swadharma ) of things. It denied the principle of causality. A sugarcane yields sugar because it is its nature. The only law is the law of svabhava. Thus svabhava vada is the cornerstone of Charvaka philosophy. But this philosophy leads to automatism, to pre-determination. The Charvakas deny freewill. A particle is not conscious. Only when they are arranged in a particular manner and proportion, they become conscious. Charvakas identify the self with prana or the mind. Nature is indifferent to good and evil, they say.

Virtue and vice are conventions. The only goal is the pursuit of pleasure. The Jains and Buddhists had the greatest objection to this hedonistic philosophy. The Charvakas refused to be swayed by Vedanta. They did not believer in Karma. Kautilya hailed Charvaka philosophy as one of the three most important doctrines, the other being Sankhya and Uoga. The Mahabharata speaks highly of Charvakas as ?venerable sages.?

Lokayata, popular atheism, came out of the Charvaka philosophy. But the Lokayatas followed a moderate policy. With the advent of the Puranic Age, we come full circle. Remember, the Vedas began with belief in god. The Charvakas denied God. And the Upanishads were for and against God, while the Puranas brought God and man very close to each other.

Dear Reader, no other people had gone through such a diverse experience as the Hindus. They have much to give to the world.




Previous Page Previous Page (10/35) - Next Page (12/35) Next Page


copyright© 2004 Bharat Prakashan(Delhi) Ltd. All Rights Reserved
Designed and Hosted by KSHEERAJA Web Solutions Pvt Ltd