Current Issue
Organiser Home
Editorial
EXPOSE
Reports
Comment
The Moving Finger Writes
Media Watch
Thinking Aloud
Bookmark
A PAGE FROM HISTORY
RETROSPECT
Kids Org.
News Round-up
Readers’ Forum:
INTERESTING PEOPLE
PERSPECTIVE
Kerala Newsletter

Previous Issues
September 04, 2011

August 28, 2011
August 21, 2011
August 14, 2011
August 07, 2011

July 31, 2011
July 24, 2011
July 17, 2011
July 10, 2011
July 03, 2011

June 26, 2011
June 19, 2011
June 12, 2011
June 05, 2011

May 29, 2011
May 22, 2011
May 15, 2011
May 08, 2011
May 01, 2011

April 24, 2011
April 17, 2011
April 10, 2011
April 03, 2011

March 27, 2011
March 20, 2011
March 13, 2011
March 06, 2011

February 27, 2011
February 20, 2011
February 13, 2011
February 06, 2011

January 30, 2011
January 23, 2011
January 16, 2011
January 09, 2011
January 02, 2011

December 26, 2010
December 19, 2010
December 12, 2010
December 05, 2010
November 28, 2010
November 21, 2010
November 14, 2010
November 7, 2010

October 31, 2010
October 24, 2010
October 17, 2010
October 10, 2010
October 03, 2010

2010 Issues
2009 Issues
2008 Issues
2007 Issues
2006 Issues

Organiser
About us
Advertisement
Circulation
Contact us

Subscribe


January 02, 2011




Page: 37/38

Home > 2011 Issues > January 02, 2011

Media Watch

Obstinate on 2G scam UPA stalls Parliament

HOW long is the UPA government going to stall parliamentary proceedings causing irreparable loss to the administration? The Hindu (November 24) had some sharp remarks to make about the UPA’s dilatory tactics. "Given the public’s sense of disgust with the scale of corruption, the Congress ought to realise that its objection to a JPC is being seen as a tacit admission of guilt, or, at best, a certain unwillingness to allow the guilty to be exposed," said the paper. It pointed out that "the longer the stalemate continues, the more this perception will gain ground" adding that "that is why it is essential that the Opposition demand be conceded forthwith, so that the probe can begin and Parliament can start functioning again".

May be, by the time this appears in print, the UPA has conceded the Opposition demand, but its behaviour leaves much to be desired. The Hindu stressed that there is no reason to fear JPC, but, "so enormous is the scale of the 2G spectrum scandal and so widely dispersed and influential are the dramatis personae that ordinary instruments of investigation may not be enough to get to the bottom of the affair". And what is the amount involved in the scandal? The Hindu said "the presumptive loss is anywhere between Rs 60,000 crore to Rs 179,000 crore".

Bitterly criticising Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, a columnist, A Surya Prakash, writing in The New Indian Express (November 15) pointed out that calling the PM a ‘clean’ politician whose personal conduct in financial matters is above reproach means nothing "so long as he allows members of his Cabinet to merrily swindle the Exchequer". Proceeding, Surya Prakash said: "Apologists for the Congress say that the compulsions of coalition politics prevent the PM from proceeding against Raja, if that be so, we are left with no option but to conclude that Singh’s desire to survive in office far outweighs his concern for probity in public life. He seems to have just three priorities-survival in office, protecting the Congress’ interests and ensuring that the UPA remains intact.

Singh has already given us sufficient indication that national interest is not a priority for him when he took that untenable decision to appoint PJ Thomas as the CVC..." The cost to the exchequer some hold is Rs 1.76 lakh crore. What does that mean? Freedom First, the liberal magazine (December 2010) says that it is equivalent to (a) the entire defence budget for the year 2010-11 (b) almost one sixth the size of the Union budget (c) over two thirds of the Centre’s interest burden of Rs. 2.49 lakh crore (d) more than thrice the Rs 51,309 crore the Centre will get from profits and dividends of Public Sector Units this year (e) roughly seven times the Union health budget of Rs 25,154 crore and finally (f) more than thrice the Union education budget of Rs 49,904 crore.

Writing in the same issue of Freedom First, a former Deputy Director of the Intelligence Bureau, Ashok Karnik wanted to know why Indians are so corrupt. He should know. He makes the point that delivering justice takes a long, long time. How? This is how, according to Karnik: "When a Minister comes under a cloud, his first response is to deny the charge. If irrefutable proof is presented, a preliminary inquiry by the CBI is ordered. If the CBI gets further proof, it is allowed to register a case. The CBI takes a couple of years to come up with a criminal charge; it may then be allowed or disallowed to file charges in the court. If the case ultimately starts, it can take a few years to complete during which the CBI may even withdraw the chargesheet, depending on new political alignments. If, after all this, a leader is convicted, he goes in appeal which may remain undecided during his and our life time. Do we see anybody punished? If a leader is not actually caught committing a crime, there is an elaborate system whereby he is not held even accountable for wrong-doing..." And so it goes. So, why should any politician be afraid of committing a crime?

The Hindu (December 4) all but corroborated this in a report. According to the paper, the Centre has informed the Supreme Court that sanction for prosecution is awaited in 126 cases registered under the Prevention of Corruption Act against various public servants. These cases were registered from 2000 to 2010, with Customs and Central Excise accounting for the maximum number of 69 persons. Is this what delivering justice is all about? The case of PJ Thomas is intriguing, to say the least. He was chargesheeted in the Rs 2.8 crore Palmolive import case in Kerala a long time ago. The case is pending. Shouldn’t his appointment have been deferred till the case was settled? As INA ( December 3) noted, "the apex court has also questioned the propriety of Thomas conducting an inquiry as CVC when a probe is pending against him. Said INA: "Thomas may well be innocent, but that needs to be proved first. Till then, Thomas puts himself, the post of the CVC and the government "in a very tenuous moral area".

According to the paper, "the government has no one but itself to blame for foisting Thomas upon the country and at a time when it was on the verge of dealing with multiple crises regarding the spectrum scandal... Why it chose to add to its woes by insisting on Thomas is a question only it can answer. It bears repeating that the CVC has to be, like Caesar’s wife, above suspicion... The appointment of Thomas as CVC was a disaster. To set the situation right, he must go now". The Hindu (December 8) said that "CVC’s post is much too sensitive and important to be undermined by an appointment that should never have been made". "No doubting, Thomas should go" the paper concluded.




Previous Page Previous Page (36/38) - Next Page (38/38) Next Page


copyright© 2004 Bharat Prakashan(Delhi) Ltd. All Rights Reserved
Designed and Hosted by KSHEERAJA Web Solutions Pvt Ltd