Current Issue
Organiser Home
The Moving Finger Writes
Media Watch
Thinking Aloud
Kids Org.
News Round-up
Readers’ Forum:
Kerala Newsletter

Previous Issues
September 04, 2011

August 28, 2011
August 21, 2011
August 14, 2011
August 07, 2011

July 31, 2011
July 24, 2011
July 17, 2011
July 10, 2011
July 03, 2011

June 26, 2011
June 19, 2011
June 12, 2011
June 05, 2011

May 29, 2011
May 22, 2011
May 15, 2011
May 08, 2011
May 01, 2011

April 24, 2011
April 17, 2011
April 10, 2011
April 03, 2011

March 27, 2011
March 20, 2011
March 13, 2011
March 06, 2011

February 27, 2011
February 20, 2011
February 13, 2011
February 06, 2011

January 30, 2011
January 23, 2011
January 16, 2011
January 09, 2011
January 02, 2011

December 26, 2010
December 19, 2010
December 12, 2010
December 05, 2010
November 28, 2010
November 21, 2010
November 14, 2010
November 7, 2010

October 31, 2010
October 24, 2010
October 17, 2010
October 10, 2010
October 03, 2010

2010 Issues
2009 Issues
2008 Issues
2007 Issues
2006 Issues

About us
Contact us


August 21, 2011

Page: 3/42

Home > 2011 Issues > August 21, 2011

Disband Kashmir interlocutors panel

THE Kashmir interlocutors have lost all credibility, by their own actions and now their continuance has become untenable. From the beginning we have been skeptical of their mission. It was not explained as to how the UPA government arrived at the conclusion that the Kashmir solution lies in the appointment of a team of interlocutors and that they can do more than what the political process in the country cannot.

In appointing such a team, the centre should have at least done the minimum necessary home work. The shabby manner in which the team was constituted is matched only by the shoddy way in which Dr Manmohan Singh runs the government.

Firstly, what are the credentials of these members of the team to negotiate with different factions in the Valley? They are not political heavy weights. They are not considered experts on Kashmir affairs. Most Indians have not even heard of these people. And is there anything outstanding about these three individuals to make their views acceptable either to the people in the state or the country? If the idea was to find an honest agenda to talk about Kashmir, the centre should have taken care of all these aspects. After all, it requires a huge national mandate to deal with Kashmir—to turn the clock back—that vastly deviates from the stated national position of Jammu and Kashmir being an integral part of India.

Having said that, any study team going with the official diktat of entering into negotiations with separatists, Pak sponsored insurgents and other political players including nationalist forces in the state, should have had an unblemished reputation—authority, so that their prognosis would have been taken seriously by the entire county. The centre has in fact, wasted an opportunity. And discredited its own initiative.

The revelation that the chairman of the team, Dilip Padgoankar, a former member of the UPA nominated National Minorities Commission has enjoyed hospitalities from the ISI agent Ghulam Nabi Fai and attended seminars in the US hosted by the ISI was enough for the centre to disband the team. With every passing day new revelations surfaced. What followed the disclosure was acrimony and open discord between the team members. It has become so lousy that one member wanted Padgoankar to quit the team after the expose, while Radha Kumar, the other member seems to have also been in the ISI seminar circuit, declaring that she will not attend any meeting in future with the third member MM Ansari. All the while, the Home Ministry to which the team is officially attached is conspicuously silent. Does that mean that the centre is not serious about the role of the interlocutors? Or has the series of exposures on the members of the team convinced the centre that nothing will come out of their efforts?

The UPA government, it seems is obdurate about the funny slanging match in the interlocutors team. The taint won’t disappear, however much the so-called free thinkers try. Can the country gloss over the fact that these people have sympathised with the ISI agent and accepted his hospitality?

Immediately after the team was appointed, eleven months ago, the members made astounding statements that echoed the Hurriyat’s voice. On their first visit to the Valley, on October 24, 2010. Dilip Padgoankar courted controversy by arguing for Pakistan, to involve Islamabad to resolve the Kashmir dispute. The BJP had then, accused the interlocutors of trying to internationalise the issue.

The unmasking of the ISI links following the arrest of Fai in the US, makes us suspect that the team itself was constituted by the UPA with ulterior intentions. Is it working to create more trouble and widen the divisions in the Valley?The genteel face of the Aman ki asha crowd has no other agenda than promoting ISI designs in India. The Home Ministry, intriguingly, has been trying to cover-up and protect these people. In the latest instance an RTI has sought details of Radha Kumar’s foreign travels, which she is refusing to reveal. Reports say that Prof Kumar, who has been receiving Rs 1.5 lakh a month as remuneration from the central government with other perks, automatically comes under the RTI Act. She cannot refuse to disclose information about her junkets to attend seminars sponsored by ISI outfits. MM Ansari understandably raised his voice against both Padgoankar and Kumar for accepting junkets funded by ISI.

It is not only that the whole affair of the Kashmir panel has now become too murky, but their ability to fairly and independently deal with the issue is in doubt. In the public mind these people don’t enjoy any respect or trust. The best way out for the centre now is to immediately wind up the panel and institute an inquiry into their activities in the company of Pak patriots.

Previous Page Previous Page (2/42) - Next Page (4/42) Next Page

copyright© 2004 Bharat Prakashan(Delhi) Ltd. All Rights Reserved
Designed and Hosted by KSHEERAJA Web Solutions Pvt Ltd