|
|
![]() |
|
Let the Hindus Beware! |
| |
|
![]() |
|
H.V. Seshadri
This happened, I believe, some 30-35 years back. A
book, Religious Leaders, by Thomas and Thomas was published in
Europe. And what happened next was Muslim riots that broke out in
our country—in Bombay and elsewhere. As usual, the rioters began
attacking Hindus, torching their shops
and destroying public property.
Again, now one Baptist church minister, Jerry
Falwel, it seems, made some adverse comments about Prophet Mohammed
in a recent television interview in New York. Soon enough, on Friday
(11.10.2002) dagger wielding Muslim rioters came out on the streets
in S holapur,
Maharashtra. Papers described it as a major riot leaving eleven dead
and 125 injured and at least 20 shops gutted in arson. A couple of
Navaratri Pandals were damaged—one of them right in front of a
police station! A BJP leader’s house was also attacked.
In between these two, how many similar incidents
took place, I do not know. One may wonder, what connection is there
between some incident somewhere in the world and the Muslim mobs
indulging in aggression on Hindus, their property, religious places
and destroying public property in our country. No, there is no
connection, no logic, no local provocation whatsoever. In fact, none
of these are needed. Mostly, the local Muslim politician provokes
his religious henchmen for such acts, evidently for further st rengthening
his extremist hold upon them. And his flock follows him like robots.
But why should they at all fall a prey to such power-mad
politician’s machinations? The obvious reason, one feels, is that
they are already indoctrinated; the Holy Quran, the local mullah or
maulvi must have told them, commands them as to how to behave
towards the kafirs. Neither the politician who is cocksure about his
flock’s implicit ‘faith’ in him nor his flock need any further
logic.
When our Constitution was framed, both Pt. Nehru
and Sardar Patel had waxed eloquent that the ‘minority ghost’ had
been laid to rest forever, never to raise its head again in free
Bharat. In fact, when a Muslim League member’s demand for separate
electorates was rejected outright, he remarked that such a step
would entail the loss of younger brother’s love. To this, Sardar
Patel had cut him short by replying, “Do not speak of the younger
brother’s love, we have seen enough of it.”
And we know only too well how “the younger
brother’s love” crystallized in Muslim League had been manifested
prior to and during the gory partition days. Now, the mantle of the
League’s leadership of the Muslim masses has been, it seems, taken
over by the ‘secularist’ parties. The very first test vis-à-vis
whether Sardar Patel’s cutting remarks denoted any radical change in
the attitude of Congress—the then all-round ruling party in the
country—came about sooner than expected. And to the great relief of
the Muslim leaders they very soon found that there was no such fear.
The incident in early fifties bears repetition if only because it
sets the key-note of the trend of political leadership of the
‘secularist’ brand in free Bharat. Congress had gone in for alliance
with the ‘younger brother’ Muslim League in Kerala to defeat the
Communists at the Assembly elections, which was due to take place
shortly. When the pressmen queried Pt. Nehru whether the Congress
was justified in joining hands with such a notoriously fanatic
communal party which had caused the partition of the country he had
replied, “The present League is a new one and not the old one.” But
to his great misfortune the then League’s President Mohommed Islamil
issued a statement on the very next day that the “present League is
the same as the old one”!
At the level of riots also the fanatic Muslim
leadership found soon enough that the Government was bending
backwards to accommodate its aggressive anti-Hindu tactics. The
police would invariably restrict or change the routes of Hindu
religious processions avoiding Muslim majority areas or mosques on
the roadside.
How the hold of local Muslim political leadership
is crucial in all such matters also became evident just last year in
Bangalore. A nearly 40,000 strong RSS swayamsevaks’ camp was held on
the northern outskirts of the city. About half of that number was t o
pass through a locality densely populated with Muslims. The city
police commissioner Shri Sangliana, a very able impartial IPS from
Mizoram, tried to dissuade the RSS leadership from passing through
that locality. On his part, he knew well enough that the RSS men
would never indulge in any provocative slogan or act on their part.
However, the local Congress MP Zaffar Sherif, who had earlier
visited the camp during its preparatory days, came to the rescue of
the police and assured that there would be absolutely no trouble and
the RSS route march could safely pass through that locality. (Shri
Sherif says with pride that he had attended the RSS shakha in his
home town, Chitradurga in Karnataka.)
But the question is: Do we find such sober Muslim
political leadership at present all over the country? Of course,
“No”. In that case, is there really any other alternative except to
deal with rabidly fanatical politicians and the localities that
harbour such jehadi groups with such a
firm hand that it must serve as a never-to-be-forgotten lesson for
them? Evidently, this must be done by the law-enforcing authorities,
irrespective of the political colour of the local ruling party. But
in the present state of affairs,
do we really find such strictly impartial law-enforcing police force
able to keep itself aloof from political interference? The emphatic
one word reply is “No”. Under these circumstances, if the Hindus
honestly feel pained at heart and wish to live
in honour and security, they will have to bear the responsibility of
en-bloc opposing such political parties in any kind of future
election and not falling into the political trap of appeal to caste
or sect or any kind of favour by such parties. On the contrary, if
they fail in this primary test of a living society, it will be at
the cost of their lives and property and sanctity of their holy
religious places. Let them beware!
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|